Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Dent ; 36(3): 130-135, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37364190

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare Candida albicans adhesion and quantify the biofilm formed on thermopolymerizable (T.PMMA) and 3D printing (3D.PMMA) polymethyl methacrylate through quantitative and qualitative analyses. METHODS: The specimens were made (n= 39/material) by conventional polymerization (T.PMMA) and designed in Autodesk Meshmixer software, followed by 3D printing (3D.PMMA) - CAD-CAM method. After the roughness standardization, the monospecies biofilm of C. albicans (ATCC 10231) was submitted to adhesion analysis, verifying the quantification and microbial load, in triplicate, by the methods of counting colony forming units (CFU/mL) and staining with crystal violet, followed by optical density reading, respectively. Qualitative analyses were performed by scanning electron microscopy to analyze the surface characteristics of the specimens and biofilm formed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between resins regarding the count of CFU/mL (log¹°+ 1) and optical density values (P≤ 0.05). RESULTS: T.PMMA (5.78 ± 0.43) had a CFU/mL count (P< 0.001) higher than 3D.PMMA (4.84 ± 0.39). There was a difference between C. albicans biofilm accumulation (P< 0.001), in which on T.PMMA (1.59 ± 0.31) was higher than 3D.PMMA (1.10 ± 0.14). The qualitative analyses corresponded to the quantitative ones and allowed the visualization of more porosities in T.PMMA. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The adhesion (microbial load and biofilm accumulation) of C. albicans was lower in the 3D printed polymethyl methacrylate when compared to the thermopolymerizable model.


Subject(s)
Candida albicans , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Surface Properties , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Prostheses and Implants , Materials Testing
2.
J Dent ; 127: 104346, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36414990

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the degree of satisfaction (SD) and the impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of edentulous patients treated with conventional complete dentures (CCDs) and mandibular overdentures (IODs) with a short anteroposterior spread (S-APS) or a large antero-posterior spread (L-APS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Edentulous patients were treated with CCDs and subsequently randomly allocated to receive a bar clip mandibular overdenture retained by 2 interforaminal implants (Control) or 4 (Test: 2 additional implants distal to the mental foramen). The Oral Health Impact Profile Edent questionnaire (OHIP-20E) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were applied at a mean follow-up of 38.5 months to assess the impact on OHRQoL and DS, respectively. Comparisons between the type of prosthesis and the extension of the AP spread were made with Student's t test for paired samples and for independent samples, respectively, at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The IODs had significantly lower OHRQoL values ​​in the dimensions "functional limitation" (p=0.03), "physical pain" (p=0.02), "psychological discomfort" (p<0.01), "disability physical" (p<0.01) and "general score" (p<0.01) (n=20 patients). The IODs presented DS values ​​significantly for "aesthetics" (p=0.04), "stability" (p=0.03), "masticatory capacity" (p<0.01), "function" (p<0.01) and "oral condition" (p=0.03). The S-APS group (control) resulted in significantly lower values ​​in the dimensions "physical pain" (p<0.01) and "general score" (p<0.01) and no domain with statistical difference in the VAS scale. CONCLUSIONS: IODs significantly improved OHRQoL and DS. The increase in AP spread did not result in benefits for the patient's OHRQOL and DS in this clinical study. (Study Protocol Number: 1.452.492) CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Implantology has experienced in the last 20 years a permanent evolution that aim at increasing predictability and improving long-term clinical performance. Placement of short implants distally to the mental foramen, for instance, and the resulting increase of the anterior-posterior spread, is a promising approach and is worthy of investigation.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Mouth, Edentulous , Humans , Denture, Overlay , Quality of Life , Personal Satisfaction , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Patient Satisfaction , Esthetics, Dental , Mouth, Edentulous/psychology , Pain
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 36(6): 1173-1179, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919618

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the primary and secondary stability of conventional (≥ 8-mm) and extrashort (4-mm) implants in edentulous patients using different methods of assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients underwent implant surgery and were randomly allocated into two groups: test, with two conventional implants in the anterior region and two extrashort (4-mm) implants in the posterior region; and control, with two conventional (≥ 8-mm) implants in the anterior region only. Primary stability (S1-implant placement) was assessed by insertion torque, implant stability quotient (ISQ, Osstell), and damping capacity (PTV, Periotest), while secondary stability (S221-21 days after S1; and S2clip-at prosthetic loading, ± 3 months after S1) was evaluated by ISQ and PTV. The statistical significance level was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Fifty conventional implants and 24 extrashort implants were placed in 25 patients. The overall survival rate was 97.3%. There was no statistically significant difference between the insertion torque of conventional and extrashort implants (P > .05). PTV values were significantly lower for conventional implants only at S2clip (P = .041). ISQ values were significantly greater for conventional implants at S1 (P = .004), whereas at S221 and S2clip, no differences were found (P = .413 and P = .490, respectively). Damping capacity showed no significant differences between S1-S2M21 and S1-S2clip. ISQ values showed a significant increase of stability between S1-S2clip, for conventional (P = .022) and extrashort (P = .005) implants, which was different from that observed between S1-S221. There was a moderate negative correlation between the PTV and ISQ variables (r = 0.5) of extrashort implants, and between the PTV and insertion torque (r = -0.3) of conventional implants. For extrashort implants, there was a null correlation between ISQ and torque (r = 0.0). There was a moderately positive correlation between ISQ and torque (r = 0.3) in the conventional implant group. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that extrashort and conventional implants present similar primary and secondary stability values and may similarly influence restorative protocols.


Subject(s)
Mandible , Humans , Mandible/surgery , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...